A king has gifted his son a gift that most of us will question. At his son’s birthday, he gifted him with a pet dragon! This may not be suitable for a kingdom with a populated place.

It isn’t a great idea to have a pet dragon in a kingdom because it can destroy the kingdom and kill a lot of innocent civilians, which could cause a downfall of the king. This can cause punishment and death to all the guards and knights that will try to kill the pet dragon, so my point is that dragons can get out of hand.

My other reason for not having a pet dragon is that dragons can destroy ancient artifacts that can be important to the future. This is one of the many reasons that we don’t know what happened many years ago. Dragons are animals that can destroy anything easily.

Like everyone, I can see something dangerous like a dragon isn’t the best idea, so it would be a good idea to give a child a different pet apart from a dragon. This can also cause destruction so I disagree to having a pet dragon.

Well done Oscar. You have an introduction, argument paragraphs, and a conclusion. You have given some evidence to back up your points and you’ve started to experiment with sentence type. Your word choices are powerful and help to engage the reader. Good job!